By Hugh T. Ferguson, NASFAA Managing Editor
Last month Rep. Judy Chu (D-Calif.) formally reintroduced the Protecting Our Students by Terminating Graduate Rates that Add to Debt (POST GRAD) Act, which would restore subsidized loan eligibility for individuals seeking a graduate degree.
Specifically, the bill would once again make graduate students eligible to receive federal Direct Subsidized Loans, which was ended in 2011 by the Budget Control Act.
“A lifetime of debt shouldn’t be the cost for obtaining a graduate degree,” Chu said in a press release. “So I’m reintroducing the POST GRAD Act to restore the availability of Federal Direct Subsidized Loans for graduate students and make higher education more attainable to everyone in America.”
NASFAA supports the legislation and has been advocating for graduate students to have eligibility for subsidized federal loans restored since the eligibility was eliminated in 2011 as a cost-saving measure.
The bill has been introduced several times in the past without passage. Stay tuned to Today’s News for additional coverage.
Publication Date: 11/6/2023
Today's News for July 17, 2024
Republicans Press OIG for Updates on FAFSA Rollout Investigation
Today's News for July 15, 2024
House Committee Advances GOP Bill That Would Cement October 1 FAFSA Launch Date
Today's News for July 11, 2024
New Bill Would Double Maximum Pell Grant, Introduce SAP Reset
Today's News for June 28, 2024
Bipartisan Workforce Pell Act and DETERRENT Act Removed From Defense Bill
Today's News for June 13, 2024
NASFAA Signs Onto Letter Opposing Bipartisan Workforce Pell Act and DETERRENT Act
Today's News for June 12, 2024
NASFAA Requests Technical Amendments to the FAFSA Simplification and FUTURE Acts
NASFAA Submits Letter for Congress Urging Delay of GE/FVT Institutional Reporting Requirements
NASFAA Endorses Student Loan Servicers Accountability Act
Republicans Say Department of Education Is 'Stonewalling' FAFSA Investigation
Cardona Faces Pointed Questions on FAFSA Rollout During House Hearing on ED’s FY 25 Budget Proposal
"From a Hardship to a Crisis" - NASFAA Testifies on Current Status of the FAFSA Rollout
Biden Signs FY 2024 Budget Into Law With Retention of Pell Grant Funding
Bipartisan Senators Urge ED to Delay Gainful Employment and Financial Value Transparency Reporting
Short-Term Funding Bill Would Rescind SAI Formula Change
NASFAA Signs on to Letter Expressing Opposition to Section 6 of the Bipartisan Workforce Pell Act
Financial Aid Professionals Reflect on Their Most Recent 2023-24 Virtual Pipeline
Foxx Calls for Cardona to Resign, While Republicans Ramp Up Oversight Efforts on ED
Legislative Tracker: Institutional Grant & Incentive Programs
Senate GOP Launches Website for Reporting FAFSA Issues
Impacts of COVID-19 Relief Funding on Higher Education
Biden Signs Another Short-Term Spending Extension to Avert a Government Shutdown
House Republicans Demand Answers From Cardona on Student Loan Audit
Part 1 Deep Dive: Foxx’s College Cost Reduction Act Includes Financial Aid Offer Provisions
House GOP Pushes ED for Cost Estimate on Student Loan Debt Relief Proposals
Top House Education Committee Democrat Expresses Concern Over Further FAFSA Processing Delays
Cassidy: 2024-25 FAFSA 'Has Not Gone Well'
House Education Committee Advances Bipartisan Short-Term Pell Grant Legislation
Bipartisan Group of Senators Urges ED to Provide Clear FAFSA Guidance, Verification Relief
House Passes Legislation Revising Foreign Gift Reporting Requirements
House Unveils Bipartisan Short-Term Pell Grant Legislation
Biden Signs Short-Term Spending Plan to Avert Government Shutdown
Senate Considers Resolution to Rescind the SAVE Student Loan Repayment Plan
Ben R | 11/10/2023 9:57:35 AM
All this will do is shift the timing of the loan subsidy.
While we don’t call them “subsidized” on the front end, due to their high IDR uptake graduate loans are receiving the lion’s share of subsidies already. Their higher loan limits (or lack thereof in the case of PLUS) and the structure of IDR means most of the benefits of IDR goes to those with graduate degrees and generally the more you borrow, the more you benefit from IDR, especially those pursuing PSLF.
Therefore, reinstating the subsidized loan for graduate students would simply shift the timing of the subsidy with little change to the overall level of financial support. While they’d have a slightly lower balance at graduation, those needing IDR would still need IDR on the back end. It’s hard to imagine for example that someone who needs IDR for a $109,000 balance including $9000 in capitalized interest, would NOT need IDR if only the balance was just $100,000.
David S | 11/6/2023 11:2:43 AM
Considering how much pearl clutching we get from lawmakers and pundits about what a disproportionate amount of the total student loan debt is for graduate students, I sure hope they're now all going to support this bill (nice acronym, btw) enthusiastically. Graduate students are forced to the back of the line for every Title IV dollar if they even get to line up at all, and while the absence of loan subsidies alone isn't the entire problem, it certainly contributes.
Then for some suggestions for next steps after this, see https://www.nasfaa.org/gp_loan_limits.
You must be logged in to comment on this page.